Why does the world need both mathematical proof AND a $10 million prize verifying that we have failed to answer biology’s most basic questions? Why does the world need a science paper like “Biology transcends the limits of computation”? This video explains.
Today if you’re diagnosed with Stage 3 or Stage 4 cancer, your chances of surviving are no better than if you lived in 1930. But your chances are 100 times better when catch it early.
What if you could catch cancer SUPER early – years before any obvious indication of a problem?
And what if you could then solve the problem at its roots so it never recurs at all?
George Halvorson, founder of the Institute for InterGroup Understanding, reviewed Evolution 2.0.
He writes:
“I had the opportunity to function as the CEO of a small hospital system and then a larger hospital system. We did some things in those settings to make care better and safer for patients.
That was an extremely useful learning experience.
As a believer in classic Darwinism, I saw how hard it was for us to Read more »
Biblical Scholar Dr. Michael Heiser reveals a very important piece of information about how the Bible was written which directly impacts how we interpret it; The Bible was written FOR us but not TO us.
While this simple fact does not undermine the impact of the Bible on our lives, it does alter the lens that we read, interpret and ultimately apply through.
Take the explanation of wealth as an example.Read more »
We get a significant number of submissions for the Evolution 2.0 Prize. Unfortunately, most of them do not even come close. However, some make very respectable attempts to reframe the problem and this new entry by Dmitry Kukuruznyak is above average. Dmitry is a physicist from Russia and I often find that, for some reason, physicists often bring a blend of artistry and rigor to these questions. He explores whether there might be a blurry boundary between life and non-life and has a lot of good observations about the unique characteristics of biology. You will also find detailed explorations of emergent properties in chemistry. His submission is followed by a thoughtful response from my research team explaining what he has and hasn’t achieved thus far. It is not without its problems but it raises good questions.
Perry Marshall was invited to Notre Dame Business School to present at a masters level class on new trends in medicine and biology. This talk canvases a spectrum of issues from COVID- 19, virus evolution and the dark underbelly of cancer research.
How many of your Favorite People On Earth have you lost to cancer?
My list is long and growing. My dad died at age 44. Cancer took out my grandpa; numerous aunts and uncles, and my dear friend Tom Hoobyar, the closest person I had to a dad in my adult life. I’ve got two childhood friends, my age, battling it right now.
In my book Evolution 2.0 I said: Cancer is evolution run amok, and until we get evolution right we’re never gonna beat cancer.
A friend put me in touch with a scientist named Henry Heng because of my book. Henry is a cancer researcher in Detroit.
Long before I wrote anything about cancer, Henry had reached the conclusion, simply based on his own cancer research, that the conventional theory of evolution was unworkable.
He saw that cancer evolves at breathtaking speed – especially once you start trying as hard as you can to kill it.
Five years ago this week, the first shipment of Evolution 2.0 books landed on my doorstep. It had taken six years to write. I felt such incredible elation.
The book has weathered exacting scrutiny by opponents. It’s brought me into a number of debates with people across the spectrum from left to right. While minor errors were corrected in the 2017 paperback, there is no substantial criticism of the book in the blogosphere. The book has sold well with over 200 reviews on Amazon (4.4 stars).
In 2019, I interviewed Joel Salatin, advocate of alternate farming.
Our conversation prompted me to predict for the decade 2020 – 2029 that laws would be overturned making local food production and distribution a rising economic force.
I didn’t know then that COVID was about to speed that process up 10X.
martin rag { hey Perry, just to clarify: no, I am not YEC, it seems that Earth is way older than 6000 - ... }
martin rag { Dear Perry, >Joana is certainly interested in bioengineering of self replicating machines. Just because it hasn’t been done doesn’t mean ... }
martin rag { Dear Perry, once again, thank you for not censoring my comments. Also, thank you for your patience and understanding.. . I ... }
Michael Hallett { Hi, I'm looking for recommendations on a genetics PhD program with researchers pursuing lines of research congruent with EV2.0. Any ... }
Patrick Greer { Thank you. Your reply meant a lot. Had another Dr. visit today. Numbers still great. I found out about you ... }
Josephine Head { Save a lot of time and money. Focus on unique physics of actin networks has exciting biological breakthrough potential as ... }
Jimmie Miller { FYI, Thought you might be interested in NSF announcement below -jimmie The 2023 NSF Physics Frontiers Centers NSF Physics Frontiers ... }
Raymond Hughes { - THE BIOLOGICAL BIG BANG- Like gravity that assembles material matter into suns and planets, magnetic fields assemble shards of ... }
Raymond Hughes { The conversation didn't get any nearer to what the process of evolution is about or draw me any nearer to ... }
Paul Benson { I understand where you're coming from. I'm writing a letter to atheists, and I've had to tackle some difficult issues ... }